Succession of Healy v. Barlow

693 So. 2d 9, 96 La.App. 5 Cir. 720, 1997 La. App. LEXIS 599, 1997 WL 132966
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMarch 25, 1997
DocketNo. 96-CA-720
StatusPublished

This text of 693 So. 2d 9 (Succession of Healy v. Barlow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Succession of Healy v. Barlow, 693 So. 2d 9, 96 La.App. 5 Cir. 720, 1997 La. App. LEXIS 599, 1997 WL 132966 (La. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Inasmuch as Mr. and Mrs. Jeff Barlow (1) were not named in either the petition or prayer, (2) are residents of the State of Texas and (3) had no agents, registered or otherwise, for service of process in Louisiana, the trial court judgment of May 15, 1996, which upheld the Barlows’ exceptions and preter-mitted their request for sanctions, was fully correct and appropriate.

Appeals in Louisiana are favored; accordingly, we deny the Barlows’ request for attorney fees because of the appeal from the May 15, 1996 judgment. Appellants are, however, to pay all other costs of this appeal.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
693 So. 2d 9, 96 La.App. 5 Cir. 720, 1997 La. App. LEXIS 599, 1997 WL 132966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-healy-v-barlow-lactapp-1997.