Succession of Harrell v. Erris-Omega Plantation

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Succession of Harrell v. Erris-Omega Plantation

50 So. 3d 158, 2010 La. LEXIS 2832, 2010 WL 5153138

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedDecember 17, 2010

DocketNo. 2010-C-2059

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 So. 3d 158 (Succession of Harrell v. Erris-Omega Plantation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Succession of Harrell v. Erris-Omega Plantation, 50 So. 3d 158, 2010 La. LEXIS 2832, 2010 WL 5153138 (La. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Harrell, Simon Succ. of et al.;— Plaintiff; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. G, No. 222,091; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-138.

WRIT GRANTED. The courts have recognized that a judgment may be annulled for fraud and ill practices when (1) the circumstances under which the judgment was rendered show the deprivation of legal rights of the litigant who seeks relief and (2) enforcement of the judgment would be unconscionable or inequitable. Calcasieu Parish School Board v. Parker, 02-0339 (La. App. 3 Cir. 10/2/02), 827 So.2d 543, writ denied, 02-2719 (La.1/10/03), 834 So.2d 440. Plaintiffs’ Petition to Annul, which must be considered on the face of the pleading in ruling on an exception of no cause of action, alleges sufficient facts to assert a cause of action under La. C.C.P. art. 2004 to annul the April 20, 2009, judgment for fraud and ill practices. Not only was the judgment rendered in plaintiffs’ and counsel’s absence, due in part to confusion over a continuance request, but it goes well beyond the initial pleadings by granting relief not prayed for. In addition, the record does not support the defendant’s assertion that a settlement of the claims was reached by the parties. In fact, price was still at issue and the succession representative had not yet obtained court approval. Accordingly, the judgments of the court of appeal and the trial court are reversed, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings on plaintiffs’ petition to annul the April 20, 2009, judgment of the trial court.

KNOLL and CLARK, JJ., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Harrell, Simon Succ. of et al.;— Plaintiff; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. G, No. 222,091; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 10-138.

WRIT GRANTED. The courts have recognized that a judgment may be annulled for fraud and ill practices when (1) the circumstances under which the judgment was rendered show the deprivation of legal rights of the litigant who seeks relief and (2) enforcement of the judgment would be unconscionable or inequitable. Calcasieu Parish School Board v. Parker, 02-0339 (La. App. 3 Cir. 10/2/02), 827 So.2d 543, writ denied, 02-2719 (La.1/10/03), 834 So.2d 440. Plaintiffs’ Petition to Annul, which must be considered on the face of the pleading in ruling on an exception of no cause of action, alleges sufficient facts to assert a cause of action under La. C.C.P. art. 2004 to annul the April 20, 2009, judgment for fraud and ill practices. Not only was the judgment rendered in plaintiffs’ and counsel’s absence, due in part to confusion over a continuance request, but it goes well beyond the initial pleadings by granting relief not prayed for. In addition, the record does not support the defendant’s assertion that a settlement of the claims was reached by the parties. In fact, price was still at issue and the succession representative had not yet obtained court approval. Accordingly, the judgments of the court of appeal and the trial court are reversed, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings on plaintiffs’ petition to annul the April 20, 2009, judgment of the trial court.

KNOLL and CLARK, JJ., would deny.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 So. 3d 158, 2010 La. LEXIS 2832, 2010 WL 5153138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-harrell-v-erris-omega-plantation-la-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack