Succession of Hacker
This text of 28 La. Ann. 446 (Succession of Hacker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
On Motion to Dismiss.
A motion is made to dismiss this appeal because it is taken [447]*447from an interlocutory or dor wliicb, it is alleged, will not causo an irreparable injury.
Tlio administrator obtained an order to sell property on terms of one third cash and balance oil one and two years credit, whereupon the ap-pellee, as holder of a matured mortgage note, by rule caused the terms to be changed to cash, and from this action of tho court this appeal is taken.
We are of opinion that the order is one from which an appeal may be taken. It is reasonable to infer that injury of an irreparable character may result in the depreciation consequent upon a sale for cash instead of on terms of credit.
The motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 La. Ann. 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-hacker-la-1876.