Succession of Gohs

37 La. Ann. 428
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 15, 1885·No. No. 9317·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Todd, J.

Widow Louisa Fritz and J. N. Folwell, by separate oppositions to the final account of the executor of Gohs’ succession, seek to be recognized as creditors respectively of said succession—one for $1095, and the other for $250 ; and appeal from a judgment rejecting their demands.

The amount in the hands of the executor remaining for distribution, is $1345, the rest having been previously distributed under a prior judgment, homologating the executor’s account wherein not opposed, and which judgment has become final, no appeal from the same having been taken.

Therefore, whether we consider the amount of the demands sought to be enforced or the amount of the funds for distribution, it is plain that this Court is without jurisdiction.

The case comes clearly within those of Succession of Duran, 34 Ann. 585, and Succession of McDowell, 35 Ann. 1025.

The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Succession of Gohs, 37 La. Ann. 428 (La. 1885).

37 La. Ann. 428 (Succession of Gohs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Succession of White
79 So. 2d 755 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1955)
In Re Weinberger Banana Co.
20 So. 2d 30 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1944)
W. K. Henderson Iron Works & Supply Co. v. Meriwether Supply Co.
140 So. 238 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1932)
Kahn v. Kahn
98 So. 167 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1923)
Robson v. Beasley
44 So. 136 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1907)