Succession of Ferrand
This text of 346 So. 2d 280 (Succession of Ferrand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Because there is testimony from two neighbors that decedent and his legatee were living together in a sexual relationship a year before his last illness and from a number of witnesses that the legatee sought to defeat an eviction proceeding by testifying that she was the “common-law wife” of decedent, the trial judge’s conclusion of open concubinage is supported by the record and we cannot substitute our judgment for his; Canter v. Koehring, La. 1973, 283 So.2d 716.
The fact that the legatee maintained her apartment in a public housing project (using it also for some of her work as a cosmetician) cannot of itself defeat the concubinage’s openness. A simple conflict of evidence does not prevent a conclusion of open concubinage by the trial judge; Succession of Battiste, La.App. 4 Cir. 1962, 145 So.2d 668, cert. denied.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
346 So. 2d 280, 1977 La. App. LEXIS 3693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-ferrand-lactapp-1977.