Succession of Falgout

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Succession of Falgout

273 So. 2d 40, 1973 La. LEXIS 5676

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 15, 1973

DocketNo. 53220

StatusPublished

This text of 273 So. 2d 40 (Succession of Falgout) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Succession of Falgout, 273 So. 2d 40, 1973 La. LEXIS 5676 (La. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Mrs. Helen Squires Falgout applying for writ of certiorari and/or review.

Granted. (See Order).

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable S. Sanford Levy, Judge of the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 7th day of May, 1973, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Mrs. Helen Squires Falgout applying for writ of certiorari and/or review.

Granted. (See Order).

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable S. Sanford Levy, Judge of the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 7th day of May, 1973, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 So. 2d 40, 1973 La. LEXIS 5676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-falgout-la-1973.