Succession of Devine

4 Rob. 366
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 15, 1843
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Rob. 366 (Succession of Devine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Succession of Devine, 4 Rob. 366 (La. 1843).

Opinion

Martin, J.

Louis Joseph Pecquet is appellant from a judgment overruling his opposition to the tableau of distribution, in which his claim for rent arrear is placed after the general law charges of the succession, while he contends that it ought to come [367]*367immediately after the funeral charges. His counsel has relied on the case of Garretson v. His Creditors, (1 Robinson, 445,) and Montilly v. His Creditors, (2 Robinson, 350,) decided in March and June, 1842, which fully support him.

It is therefore ordered, that the judgment of the Court of Probates be reversed, as far as it relates to the rank of the opposing creditor, and the tableau amended by placing his claim immediately after the funeral charges ; the costs of the appeal, and those of the court below, to be borne by the estate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Rob. 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-devine-la-1843.