Succession of Davis v. Natchitoches Coca Cola Bottling Co.

153 So. 2d 594, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 1701
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMay 14, 1963
DocketNo. 869
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 153 So. 2d 594 (Succession of Davis v. Natchitoches Coca Cola Bottling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Succession of Davis v. Natchitoches Coca Cola Bottling Co., 153 So. 2d 594, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 1701 (La. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

CULPEPPER, Judge.

The appellant neither appeared nor filed a brief in this court on or before the date fixed for argument and submission of the case. Therefore this appeal is considered abandoned and is hereby dismissed. Rule VII, Section 4(b), Uniform Rules of the Courts of Appeal, 8 LSA-R.S.; Wagner v. Cloud, La.App., 134 So.2d 322 and the cases cited therein. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the appellant.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

De Marco v. LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY
153 So. 2d 594 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 So. 2d 594, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 1701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-davis-v-natchitoches-coca-cola-bottling-co-lactapp-1963.