Succession of Cunningham
This text of 2 Rob. 443 (Succession of Cunningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Peter Cunningham is appellant from a judgment of the Court of Probates, dismissing his application to be appointed curator of the succession of James Cunningham, deceased,
Two reasons are given for refusing to make the appointment. First, That the petitioner was the commercial partner of the deceased ; and secondly, That the estate had already been administered, as a vacant estate, by a curator who had rendered his account, and that the heirs, or some of them, are now present.
The second ground appears to us sufficient. The record shows the fact .of a former administration, and that the heirs are present. The estate is, therefore, no longer vacant, and a curator cannot be appointed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Rob. 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-cunningham-la-1842.