Succession of Crain

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Succession of Crain

517 So. 2d 480, 1987 La. App. LEXIS 10982, 1987 WL 3140

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 22, 1987

DocketNo. 87 CA 1198

StatusPublished

This text of 517 So. 2d 480 (Succession of Crain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Succession of Crain, 517 So. 2d 480, 1987 La. App. LEXIS 10982, 1987 WL 3140 (La. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We issued a rule to show cause ex pro-prio motu why we should not dismiss the appeal of Sharon Haas Crain as testamentary executrix and surviving spouse in community. That appeal was taken from a judgment allegedly granted in favor of Joseph Bishop, attorney at law, permitting Mr. Bishop to withdraw as counsel of record for the executrix, Mrs. Crain.

We have thoroughly examined the record and are unable to find a signed judgment permitting Joseph Bishop to withdraw as counsel of record for the executrix, Mrs. Crain.

An appeal can only be taken from a signed judgment of the trial court. LSA-C.C.P. art. 1911. As there is no signed judgment from which to appeal, the appeal of Sharon Haas Crain must be dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We issued a rule to show cause ex pro-prio motu why we should not dismiss the appeal of Sharon Haas Crain as testamentary executrix and surviving spouse in community. That appeal was taken from a judgment allegedly granted in favor of Joseph Bishop, attorney at law, permitting Mr. Bishop to withdraw as counsel of record for the executrix, Mrs. Crain.

We have thoroughly examined the record and are unable to find a signed judgment permitting Joseph Bishop to withdraw as counsel of record for the executrix, Mrs. Crain.

An appeal can only be taken from a signed judgment of the trial court. LSA-C.C.P. art. 1911. As there is no signed judgment from which to appeal, the appeal of Sharon Haas Crain must be dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

517 So. 2d 480, 1987 La. App. LEXIS 10982, 1987 WL 3140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-crain-lactapp-1987.