Succession of Broom

14 La. Ann. 67
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 15, 1859·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

Buchanan, J.

Certain heirs of this estate took a rule upon.the administrar tor, under the Act of 1855, p. 79, jS5, to show cause why he should not furnish new and additional security for his administration, on the ground that the present securities are insufficient.

They have appealed from a judgment discharging the rule.

The appellee now moves to dismiss the appeal, on various grounds, of which one alone requires notice, viz, that the amount in dispute does not exceed three hundred dollars.

The record does not show the amount in dispute; and this hiatus has not been supplied by an affidavit on behalf of appellants.

Appeal dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Succession of Broom, 14 La. Ann. 67 (La. 1859).

14 La. Ann. 67 (Succession of Broom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lambert v. Kelley
270 So. 2d 532 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1972)
State v. Johnson
82 So. 2d 24 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1955)
Gulf Refining Co. v. Bagby
7 So. 2d 903 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1942)
Dodd v. Horan
126 So. 225 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1929)
Dodd v. Horan
122 So. 140 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1929)
Powell v. Nevada, California & Oregon Railway
28 Nev. 305 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1905)
Sarrazin v. W. R. Irby Cigar & Tobacco Co.
93 F. 624 (Fifth Circuit, 1899)
Merchants' National Bank v. Greenhood
41 P. 851 (Montana Supreme Court, 1895)