Succession of Bright

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Succession of Bright

316 So. 2d 393, 1975 La. LEXIS 5172

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 27, 1975·No. No. 55538·Published

Opinion

SANDERS, Chief Justice.

On the joint motion of R. Louis Carruth, Attorney for the Relator, Russell L. Par-pal, Guy Scoggin, Attorney for Testamentary Executor, Harry McEnerny, Jr., Respondent, and Joseph V. Bologna, Attorney for Respondent, The Diocese of the Protestant Episcopal Church in Louisiana, and on suggesting to this Honorable Court that movers have settled this matter and same has been fully compromised, and that, they desire that the pending review by this Court be dismissed with prejudice:

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that this pending review by this Court is hereby dismissed, with prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SANDERS, Chief Justice.

On the joint motion of R. Louis Carruth, Attorney for the Relator, Russell L. Par-pal, Guy Scoggin, Attorney for Testamentary Executor, Harry McEnerny, Jr., Respondent, and Joseph V. Bologna, Attorney for Respondent, The Diocese of the Protestant Episcopal Church in Louisiana, and on suggesting to this Honorable Court that movers have settled this matter and same has been fully compromised, and that, they desire that the pending review by this Court be dismissed with prejudice:

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that this pending review by this Court is hereby dismissed, with prejudice.

Succession of Bright, 316 So. 2d 393, 1975 La. LEXIS 5172 (La. 1975).

Pincite

316 So. 2d 393 (Succession of Bright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.