Succession of Barger

217 So. 2d 779
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 6, 1969
Docket3293
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 217 So. 2d 779 (Succession of Barger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Succession of Barger, 217 So. 2d 779 (La. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

217 So.2d 779 (1969)

Succession of Amelia Robin Von Hofe BARGER.

No. 3293.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

January 6, 1969.

*780 Simon & Simon, Warren M. Simon, Jr., New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

Arthur V. Flotte and Thomas J. Taylor, New Orleans, for defendant-appellee.

Before SAMUEL, CHASEZ and HALL, JJ.

HALL, Judge.

Mrs. Amelia Robin Von Hofe Barger died, testate, at Metairie Hospital in Jefferson Parish on February 1, 1968. Her succession was opened in the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans on February 14, 1968 on the petition of Kermit Frymire, who was named Testamentary Executor in decedent's will. The will and the codicil thereto was probated on February 15, 1968 and Kermit Frymire was confirmed and qualified as Testamentary Executor. On March 5, 1968 orders were signed directing the taking of inventories in Orleans, Jefferson and Ascension Parishes.

On April 3, 1968 Russell A. Thompson, a particular legatee under the terms of decedent's will, filed a petition alleging that decedent was domiciled in Ascension Parish at the time of her death and therefore the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans was without jurisdiction ratione materiae to administer the succession. An order was issued directing Kermit Frymire to show cause why the succession proceedings should not be dismissed and why all judgments and orders therein should not be declared null and void.

Trial of the rule resulted in a judgment dismissing the petition and rule to show cause and the petitioner, Russell A. Thompson appealed suspensively therefrom.

The decedent, Amelia Robin Von Hofe Barger, was married in the City of New Orleans to Harold D. Barger, a resident of the State of Ohio, on February 26, 1924. They lived together as man and wife in the State of Ohio until they were divorced on October 8, 1958. Following the divorce Mrs. Barger moved to Donaldsonville, Ascension Parish, Louisiana on February 3, 1959. She bought a home in Donaldsonville and it is undisputed that she lived and maintained her domicile in Ascension Parish from February 3, 1959 at least until January 4, 1967.

The sole issue in this matter is whether or not decedent changed her domicile sometime *781 after January 4, 1967 and was domiciled in the Parish of Orleans at the time of her death on February 1, 1968.

The record reveals that Mrs. Barger left her home in Donaldsonville and came to visit Mrs. Fred Jacobi at her home in New Orleans on January 4, 1967. She stayed with Mrs. Jacobi until May 16, 1967 when she moved to Manhattan Manor, a nursing home in Jefferson Parish. She remained as a patient in the nursing home until two days before her death when she was removed to a hospital in Jefferson Parish where she died. While she was in the nursing home she spent pracically every week end from Thursday afternoon to Sunday night or Monday evening at Mrs. Jacobi's home. From January 4, 1967 until the date of her death Mrs. Barger returned to Donaldsonville on only two occasions, once in June 1967 and again in December 1967. On each occasion she was driven there by a friend, Mrs. Carolyn George, and stayed in Donaldsonville only a few hours.

Mrs. Jacobi makes it plain in her testimony that when Mrs. Barger came to New Orleans on January 4, 1967 she came to visit her as her guest. They had been raised together and were life long friends. Mrs. Barger had visited her on other occasions. On this occasion Mrs. Barger was suffering from poor circulation in her legs and other ailments and it was difficult for her to tend to herself without help. Mrs. Jacobi testified that she administered to Mrs. Barger's needs and took care of her in anything that she had to do. Both ladies were approximately seventy-five years of age at the time and Mrs. Jacobi stated that it "got to be a little bit more than I cared to handle" and that "I felt like breaking it up." Mrs. Jacobi further testified that Mrs. Barger asked several times if she could stay permanently. On these occasions she told Mrs. Barger that it was more than she could undertake. Mrs. Jacobi testified this is what prompted Mrs. Barger to seek a nursing home so that she could be taken care of. Mrs. Jacobi stated that "the idea was" that Mrs. Barger would spend part of the time at the nursing home and that she would keep her the rest of the time. She emphasized that she didn't want to keep Mrs. Barger out of her home and that Mrs. Barger could visit in her home whenever she wished.

The record reflects that the reason Mrs. Barger did not return to her home was because she could not obtain adequate help in Donaldsonville.

Mrs. Barger never removed any of her effects to New Orleans. When she left Donaldsonville she left all of the utilities connected. On the occasion of her visit to Donaldsonville in June 1967 to see about the family burial plot (where she was subsequently buried) she did not have the utilities disconnected. She did however have the electric, gas, and telephone service disconnected on her trip to Donaldsonville on December 18, 1967 but left the water service on with instructions to Mr. Nolan Cocke, who was looking after her residence, to let the water run in freezing weather. Mrs. George who drove her to Donaldsonville on this occasion testified with regard to the utilities: "We kept telling her `why let all of that run'", and this is probably why Mrs. Barger had the electric, gas and telephone service disconnected.

The deceased never sold her Donaldsonville residence and never removed any of her furniture therefrom. She made application for and received a homestead exemption thereon each year from 1963 through 1968, the year of her death. She never changed her voting registration and was registered to vote in Donaldsonville at the time of her death. She maintained an active bank account in Donaldsonville to the time of her death. The last deposit was credited to her account on the date of her death and the last check was deposited on February 6, 1968, five days after her death. There is no evidence that any funds were ever transferred to New Orleans or that she ever had a bank account *782 in New Orleans. There was a balance of $6,852.20 in the Donaldsonville account when it was closed after her death. Her monthly bank statements were always mailed to her Donaldsonville address.

Mrs. Barger's application for admission to Manhattan Manor dated May 6, 1967 gave her address as 616 Mississippi Street, Donaldsonville, Louisiana, and this address was never changed on the records of the nursing home. Her application for "Extended Care" under the Medicare Program dated in October 1967 likewise carried the same address.

Mrs. Barger's Federal income tax returns for the years 1964, 1965 and 1966 carried her address as 616 Mississippi Street, Donaldsonville, Louisiana.

During the time Mrs. Barger was in New Orleans she was under the treatment of Dr. Arthur Bohmfalk. Dr. Bohmfalk testified that Mrs. Barger was elderly and deaf and had a circulatory problem with her legs and that she was weak and demanded a lot of attention. He stated that it was he who suggested that she go to a nursing home. He further testified that: "Mrs. Barger told me she was never going to return to Donaldsonville because she was unable to get help to take care of her. She felt that she needed somebody with her all the time."

Mr. William Riley, Administrator of Manhattan Manor, testified that in his last conversation with the deceased which occurred in January 1968 Mrs. Barger told him "She wasn't sure but she wouldn't be able to go back to Donaldsonville," because she couldn't get help there.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ardoin v. SWDI
915 So. 2d 1012 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2005)
Ray A. Ardoin v. Swdi
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2005
Succession of Lauricella
571 So. 2d 885 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1990)
Succession of Thompson v. Harrington
502 So. 2d 229 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1987)
Succession of Barnes
490 So. 2d 630 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)
Succession of Caprito
458 So. 2d 588 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1984)
Regions v. Regions
381 So. 2d 920 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1980)
LaFleur v. Seaboard Fire & Marine Insurance Co.
296 So. 2d 860 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1974)
Succession of McElwee
276 So. 2d 391 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1973)
Succession of Barger
220 So. 2d 459 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 So. 2d 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/succession-of-barger-lactapp-1969.