Succession of Balovich

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Succession of Balovich

54 So. 474, 128 La. 69, 1910 La. LEXIS 895

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Succession of Balovich. Read the opinion of the Court — 130 La. 1043 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 14, 1910·No. No. 18,437·Published

Opinions

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

PROVO STY, J.

After the appeal had been perfected by giving bond, but before the transcript of appeal had been lodged in this court, the appellant died. His legal representatives were slow in making themselves parties to the appeal, and the present motion to dismiss the appeal for want of an appellant was filed. Since then, however, the proper parties have been made so that the alleged ground for dismissal no longer exists.

The motion to dismiss is therefore overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

PROVO STY, J.

After the appeal had been perfected by giving bond, but before the transcript of appeal had been lodged in this court, the appellant died. His legal representatives were slow in making themselves parties to the appeal, and the present motion to dismiss the appeal for want of an appellant was filed. Since then, however, the proper parties have been made so that the alleged ground for dismissal no longer exists.

The motion to dismiss is therefore overruled.

Succession of Balovich, 54 So. 474, 128 La. 69, 1910 La. LEXIS 895 (La. 1910).

Pincite

54 So. 474 (Succession of Balovich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.