Suburban Pontiac, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.
This text of 448 N.E.2d 789 (Suburban Pontiac, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs. The factual determinations of the Appellate Division more nearly conform to the weight of the evidence, and there was no error of law in its declaration that General Motors had validly exercised its right to terminate the dealership agreement or in its decision that the complaint should otherwise be dismissed.
[990]*990Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
448 N.E.2d 789, 58 N.Y.2d 987, 461 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 2942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suburban-pontiac-inc-v-general-motors-corp-ny-1983.