Suburban Lodges of Am., Inc. v. Columbus Graphics Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Suburban Lodges of Am., Inc. v. Columbus Graphics Comm.

2002 Ohio 70, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1205

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 9, 2002

Docket2000-2140

StatusPublished

This text of 2002 Ohio 70 (Suburban Lodges of Am., Inc. v. Columbus Graphics Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Suburban Lodges of Am., Inc. v. Columbus Graphics Comm., 2002 Ohio 70, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1205 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 1205.]

SUBURBAN LODGES OF AMERICA, INC., APPELLANT, v. COLUMBUS GRAPHICS COMMISSION, APPELLEE. [Cite as Suburban Lodges of Am., Inc. v. Columbus Graphics Comm., 2002-Ohio-70.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 00-2140—Submitted November 13, 2001—Decided January 9, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-1065. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., dissent. __________________ COOK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I respectfully dissent. Instead of dismissing this case as improvidently allowed, I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. PFEIFER, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________ Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, L.L.P., David J. Young and Greg R. Wehrer, for appellant. Janet Jackson, City Attorney, Daniel W. Drake, Chief Counsel, and Deborah F. Hoffman, Assistant City Attorney, for appellee. Altick & Corwin Co., L.P.A., Stephen M. McHugh, Matthew D. Stokely and Matthew R. Steinke, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, American Planning Association. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 1205.]

SUBURBAN LODGES OF AMERICA, INC., APPELLANT, v. COLUMBUS GRAPHICS COMMISSION, APPELLEE. [Cite as Suburban Lodges of Am., Inc. v. Columbus Graphics Comm., 2002-Ohio-70.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 00-2140—Submitted November 13, 2001—Decided January 9, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-1065. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., dissent. __________________ COOK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I respectfully dissent. Instead of dismissing this case as improvidently allowed, I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. PFEIFER, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________ Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, L.L.P., David J. Young and Greg R. Wehrer, for appellant. Janet Jackson, City Attorney, Daniel W. Drake, Chief Counsel, and Deborah F. Hoffman, Assistant City Attorney, for appellee. Altick & Corwin Co., L.P.A., Stephen M. McHugh, Matthew D. Stokely and Matthew R. Steinke, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, American Planning Association. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2002 Ohio 70, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suburban-lodges-of-am-inc-v-columbus-graphics-comm-ohio-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack