Suburban Home Co. v. Matulewich
This text of 170 A. 862 (Suburban Home Co. v. Matulewich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There are seven specifications of alleged error in the trial court which we have examined with care. Not one of them points out any erroneous ruling in the conduct of the trial, or in the giving of judgment as permitted by the supplement of 1916 to the Practice act. There is therefore nothing on which this court could reverse: and the judgment is consequently affirmed.
It may do no harm to add that we have also examined the evidence, and find that a fair question of fact was presented for the decision of the trial judge sitting as a jury, and decided by him. With that decision, on well settled principles, we do not interfere.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 A. 862, 12 N.J. Misc. 208, 1934 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suburban-home-co-v-matulewich-nj-1934.