Suburban Abstract Corp. v. Bernard

248 A.D. 609

Opinion

In an action to recover for services in examining and reading titles to real property, judgment in plaintiff’s favor reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the evidence discloses that defendant acted only as agent, and does not disclose that defendant intended to substitute, or to superadd his personal liability for, or to, that of the principal. (Hall v. Lauderdale, 46 N. Y. 70, 74.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Suburban Abstract Corp. v. Bernard, 248 A.D. 609 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

248 A.D. 609 (Suburban Abstract Corp. v. Bernard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. . Lauderdale
46 N.Y. 70 (New York Court of Appeals, 1871)