Suburban Abstract Corp. v. Bernard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Suburban Abstract Corp. v. Bernard

248 A.D. 609

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 609 (Suburban Abstract Corp. v. Bernard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Suburban Abstract Corp. v. Bernard, 248 A.D. 609 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover for services in examining and reading titles to real property, judgment in plaintiff’s favor reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the evidence discloses that defendant acted only as agent, and does not disclose that defendant intended to substitute, or to superadd his personal liability for, or to, that of the principal. (Hall v. Lauderdale, 46 N. Y. 70, 74.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover for services in examining and reading titles to real property, judgment in plaintiff’s favor reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the evidence discloses that defendant acted only as agent, and does not disclose that defendant intended to substitute, or to superadd his personal liability for, or to, that of the principal. (Hall v. Lauderdale, 46 N. Y. 70, 74.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suburban-abstract-corp-v-bernard-nyappdiv-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack