Subscription Television, Inc. v. United States District Court For The Central District Of California

Ninth Circuit

Subscription Television, Inc. v. United States District Court For The Central District Of California

430 F.2d 957, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8453

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 29, 1970

Docket25626

StatusPublished

This text of 430 F.2d 957 (Subscription Television, Inc. v. United States District Court For The Central District Of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Subscription Television, Inc. v. United States District Court For The Central District Of California, 430 F.2d 957, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8453 (9th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

430 F.2d 957

SUBSCRIPTION TELEVISION, INC. and Subscription Television of
California, Inc., Petitioners,
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA, and The Honorable Manuel L. Real, United States
District Judge for the Central District of California,
Respondents, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA THEATRE OWNERS ASSOCIATION
et al., Real Parties in Interest.

No. 25626.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 29, 1970.

Max L. Gellam (argued), John R. Light, of Latham & Watkins of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.

William M. Byrne, Jr., U.S. Atty., Manuel L. Real, USDJ, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Allan Albala (argued) and Harry G. Swerdlow (argued), of Swerdlow, Glickbarg & Shimer, Beverly Hills, Cal., for real parties in interest.

Before BROWNING, HUFSTEDLER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner asks review of a discovery order. There is no showing of irreparable injury. Cf. Hartley Pen Co. v. United States District Court, 287 F.2d 324 (9th Cir. 1961).

Petition denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI