Sublett v. Hall

Ohio Supreme Court

Sublett v. Hall

169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 19

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 18, 1959·No. No. 35851·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The cause has been submitted on the transcript of docket and journal entries and the original papers filed in the Court of Appeals. There being no bill of exceptions, this court cannot say that there was no substantial evidence warranting the Court of Appeals in reaching the conclusion it did. On appeal on questions of law, all reasonable presumptions consistent with the record will be indulged in favor of the validity of the judgment under review and of the regularity and legality of the proceeding below.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment afirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Taft, Matthias, Beil and Herbert, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The cause has been submitted on the transcript of docket and journal entries and the original papers filed in the Court of Appeals. There being no bill of exceptions, this court cannot say that there was no substantial evidence warranting the Court of Appeals in reaching the conclusion it did. On appeal on questions of law, all reasonable presumptions consistent with the record will be indulged in favor of the validity of the judgment under review and of the regularity and legality of the proceeding below.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment afirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Taft, Matthias, Beil and Herbert, JJ., concur.

Sublett v. Hall, 169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 19 (Ohio 1959).

Pincite

169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 19 (Sublett v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.