Sublett v. Adams

362 U.S. 143, 80 S. Ct. 527, 4 L. Ed. 2d 612, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 1521
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 7, 1960·No. 406 M·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Petitioner charged that he was being held in prison without lawful authority and in violation of due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment. The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals refused the writ without either a hearing or a response from the State.

We hold that the facts alleged are such as to entitle petitioner to a hearing under Herman v. Claudy, 350 U. S. 116. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sublett v. Adams, 362 U.S. 143, 80 S. Ct. 527, 4 L. Ed. 2d 612, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 1521 (1960).

362 U.S. 143 (Sublett v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cooper v. Wiman
145 So. 2d 216 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1962)
State Ex Rel. Sublett v. Adams
115 S.E.2d 158 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1960)
Wilde v. Wyoming
362 U.S. 607 (Supreme Court, 1960)