Subke v. Eckes
42 N.W. 696, 40 Minn. 501, 1889 Minn. LEXIS 151
This text of 42 N.W. 696 (Subke v. Eckes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Subke v. Eckes, 42 N.W. 696, 40 Minn. 501, 1889 Minn. LEXIS 151 (Mich. 1889).
Opinion
The finding of fact complained of and alleged to be erroneous by the appellant was fully warranted by the testimony, and abundantly justified by the circumstances as presented upon the trial. No other question being involved, the order denying a new trial is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
42 N.W. 696, 40 Minn. 501, 1889 Minn. LEXIS 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/subke-v-eckes-minn-1889.