Subin v. Thaw
16 A.D.2d 750, 227 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10022
Opinion
Order entered on January 31,1962, granting motion to open default and vacating dismissal unanimously reversed, without costs, and application remanded to Backer, J. Where a motion has previously been noticed and heard by one Judge, any subsequent application on the same facts, either by way of reargument or renewal, must be heard by the same Judge (Grassi v. Emkay Motor Renting Co., 233 App. Div. 700; Parks v. Welsch, 230 App. Div. 734). Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Subin v. Thaw, 16 A.D.2d 750, 227 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10022 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).
16 A.D.2d 750 (Subin v. Thaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parks v. Welsch
230 A.D. 734 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)
Grassi v. Emkay Motor Renting Co.
233 A.D. 700 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)