Subin v. Thaw

16 A.D.2d 750, 227 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10022

This text of 16 A.D.2d 750 (Subin v. Thaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Subin v. Thaw, 16 A.D.2d 750, 227 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10022 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

Order entered on January 31,1962, granting motion to open default and vacating dismissal unanimously reversed, without costs, and application remanded to Backer, J. Where a motion has previously been noticed and heard by one Judge, any subsequent application on the same facts, either by way of reargument or renewal, must be heard by the same Judge (Grassi v. Emkay Motor Renting Co., 233 App. Div. 700; Parks v. Welsch, 230 App. Div. 734). Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Steuer and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parks v. Welsch
230 A.D. 734 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)
Grassi v. Emkay Motor Renting Co.
233 A.D. 700 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 A.D.2d 750, 227 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/subin-v-thaw-nyappdiv-1962.