Subh v. Department of the Army

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2399

MAJED SUBH,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, U.S. Army Records Managements & Declassification Agency, DA Freedom of Info and Privacy Office,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00433-LMB-TRJ)

Submitted: March 15, 2011 Decided: March 17, 2011

Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Majed Subh, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin J. Mikolashek, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Majed Subh appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment to the Defendant in his civil action. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Subh v. Department of the Army, No. 1:10-cv-00433-LMB-TRJ (E.D.

Va. Nov. 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED