Suber v. Hope's Windows, Inc.

38 A.D.2d 656, 327 N.Y.S.2d 294, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2611
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 22, 1971
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 38 A.D.2d 656 (Suber v. Hope's Windows, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Suber v. Hope's Windows, Inc., 38 A.D.2d 656, 327 N.Y.S.2d 294, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2611 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed July 1, 1970. The board found that claimant, who operated a metal cutting machine by means of a foot pedal, “ suffered backache while operating the pedal of a metal cutting machine on June 10, 1968, that the backache worsened and that claimant’s condition was diagnosed as herniated disc ”. The board further found “that the said work activities, the backache and the herniated disc constitute an accidental injury within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law and that disability is the result thereof ”. Respondent’s testimony of suddenly experiencing severe pain, together with other supporting evidence, was sufficient to establish accidental injury within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Matter of Stein v. Schneider, 34 A D 2d 1062). The definite time requirement essential to establish an accidental injury may be satisfied by suddenness of either cause or result (Matter of Stein v. Schneider, supra; Matter of Greensmith v. Franklin Nat. Bank, 21 A D 2d 576, affd. 16 N Y 2d 973). The board’s finding of accidental injury is supported by substantial evidence. Appellants have additionally filed a notice of appeal from a decision of the Referee. That decision is not appealable and should therefore be dismissed. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Appeal from the Referee’s decision dismissed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Staley, Jr., Greenblott, Cooke and Simons, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nizich v. Robert F. Barreca, Inc.
82 A.D.2d 996 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Middleton v. Coxsackie Correctional Facility
341 N.E.2d 527 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
Claim of Allen v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
48 A.D.2d 984 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 A.D.2d 656, 327 N.Y.S.2d 294, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suber-v-hopes-windows-inc-nyappdiv-1971.