Home/Ninth Circuit/Subafilms, Ltd. v. MGM-Pathe Communications Co.

Subafilms, Ltd. v. MGM-Pathe Communications Co.

5 F.3d 452
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 28, 1993
DocketNos. 91-56248, 91-56379, 91-56289
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 F.3d 452 (Subafilms, Ltd. v. MGM-Pathe Communications Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Subafilms, Ltd. v. MGM-Pathe Communications Co., 5 F.3d 452 (9th Cir. 1993).

Opinion

ORDER

WALLACE, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Subafilms, Ltd. The Hearst Corp., Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees v. Mgm-Pathe Communications Co., Fka Mgm/ua Communications Co. And as United Artists Corporation Mgm/ua Home Video, Inc. Warner Home Video, Inc. Warner Bros. Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants. Subafilms, Ltd. The Hearst Corp. v. Mgm-Pathe Communications Co., Fka Mgm/ua Communications Co. And as United Artists Corporation Mgm/ua Home Video, Inc. Warner Home Video, Inc. Warner Bros. Inc. United Artists Corporation
5 F.3d 452 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 F.3d 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/subafilms-ltd-v-mgm-pathe-communications-co-ca9-1993.