Sub10k, Inc. v. National Marketing Services, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sub10k, Inc. v. National Marketing Services, Ltd.

31 A.D.3d 744, 819 N.Y.S.2d 775

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 25, 2006

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 31 A.D.3d 744 (Sub10k, Inc. v. National Marketing Services, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sub10k, Inc. v. National Marketing Services, Ltd., 31 A.D.3d 744, 819 N.Y.S.2d 775 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), dated July 27, 2005, as, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

“As this case was tried to the court, without a jury, this Court’s power to review the evidence is as broad as that of the trial court, with appropriate regard given to the decision of the trial judge who was in a position to assess the credibility of the witnesses” (Bubba’s Bagels of Wesley Hills, Inc. v Bergstol, 18 AD3d 411, 412 [2005]; see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983]). Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the evidence adduced at the nonjury trial demonstrated that the contractual agreement in question was abandoned. The plaintiff acquiesced to the defendants’ actions, which were inconsistent with the terms of the contract (see Aliperti v Laurel Links, Ltd., 27 AD3d 675 [2006]; Savitsky v Sukenik, 240 AD2d 557, 559 [1997]).

The Supreme Court therefore properly dismissed the complaint. Santucci, J.P., Krausman, Mastro and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), dated July 27, 2005, as, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

“As this case was tried to the court, without a jury, this Court’s power to review the evidence is as broad as that of the trial court, with appropriate regard given to the decision of the trial judge who was in a position to assess the credibility of the witnesses” (Bubba’s Bagels of Wesley Hills, Inc. v Bergstol, 18 AD3d 411, 412 [2005]; see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983]). Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the evidence adduced at the nonjury trial demonstrated that the contractual agreement in question was abandoned. The plaintiff acquiesced to the defendants’ actions, which were inconsistent with the terms of the contract (see Aliperti v Laurel Links, Ltd., 27 AD3d 675 [2006]; Savitsky v Sukenik, 240 AD2d 557, 559 [1997]).

The Supreme Court therefore properly dismissed the complaint. Santucci, J.P., Krausman, Mastro and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.3d 744, 819 N.Y.S.2d 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sub10k-inc-v-national-marketing-services-ltd-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack