Suarez v. Switzerland
This text of 120 F. App'x 216 (Suarez v. Switzerland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Helga Suarez appeals pro se the district court’s order denying her application for leave to file this action without prepayment of the filing fee. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, and we affirm. Tripati v. First Nat’l Bank & Trust, 821 F.2d 1368, 1369-70 (9th Cir.1987) (“A district court may deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis at the outset if it appears from the face of the proposed complaint that the action is frivolous or without merit.”).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 F. App'x 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suarez-v-switzerland-ca9-2005.