Suarez v. State
Opinion
William Suarez shot and killed Wayne Wimberly with a handgun. He was convicted of felony murder, and was sentenced to life imprisonment.[109]
Suarez and Wimberly were drinking alcoholic beverages in a lounge, and engaged in a fight. Suarez left the lounge, and returned a few minutes later. With no further words being exchanged between him and Wimberly, Suarez drew a handgun and shot the unarmed victim in the back five times.
Suarez’s sole contention on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence. The evidence is sufficient to permit a rational trier of fact to find Suarez, guilty of felony murder beyond reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).
Judgment affirmed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
390 S.E.2d 219 (Suarez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.