Suarez v. State

805 So. 2d 1071, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 728, 2002 WL 112858
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 30, 2002
DocketNo. 3D01-2322
StatusPublished

This text of 805 So. 2d 1071 (Suarez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Suarez v. State, 805 So. 2d 1071, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 728, 2002 WL 112858 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm on the authority of Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592, 595 (Fla.l999)(holding that “all defendants adjudicated prior to this opinion shall have two years from the filing date within which to file claims traditionally cognizable under coram nobis”). Defendant was adjudicated prior to the Wood decision. He filed his petition for writ of error coram nobis, which we treat as a motion for rule 3.850 relief, after May 27, 2001, and beyond the two-year limit. See Wood, 750 So.2d at 595.

Accordingly, the order on appeal is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wood v. State
750 So. 2d 592 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
805 So. 2d 1071, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 728, 2002 WL 112858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/suarez-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.