Suarez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Suarez v. State

715 So. 2d 1127, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10770, 1998 WL 484581

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Suarez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9027 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 19, 1998·No. No. 98-1325·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.'

Rodolfo Suarez appeals an order denying his motion to correct his sentences. The State concedes that there is a discrepancy between the credit for time served, as reflected on the court’s docket sheet, and the credit actually appearing on the sentencing order. We reverse the order under review and remand for a hearing to ascertain the correct amount of credit for time served.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.'

Rodolfo Suarez appeals an order denying his motion to correct his sentences. The State concedes that there is a discrepancy between the credit for time served, as reflected on the court’s docket sheet, and the credit actually appearing on the sentencing order. We reverse the order under review and remand for a hearing to ascertain the correct amount of credit for time served.

Reversed and remanded.

Suarez v. State, 715 So. 2d 1127, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10770, 1998 WL 484581 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

715 So. 2d 1127 (Suarez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.