Su Wai v. Soper

8 Haw. 184, 1890 Haw. LEXIS 6
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided November 4, 1890·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Decision op

Dole, J.,

Appealed From.

A judgment of non-suit was entered in this cause in the July Term, by order of the Court, under Section 1163 of the Civil Code.

After the term had expired by adjournment sine die, the plaintiff filed his motion that the judgment he rescinded, with his affidavit explaining and justifying his non-appearance.

The explanation furnished by the affidavit may absolve the plaintiff from fault, but the motion should have been made before the end of the term. We have no statute conferring power upon Courts to vacate judgments except in the case .of judgments by default. By the principles of the common law, the power of a Court over its judgments ceases upon the final adjournment of the term in which they are rendered.

The motion is therefore overruled.

Decision op the Full Court.

This matter having been submitted to us, we hereby affirm and adopt the decision and judgment of Mr. Justice Dole, appealed from.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Su Wai v. Soper, 8 Haw. 184, 1890 Haw. LEXIS 6 (haw 1890).

8 Haw. 184 (Su Wai v. Soper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goo v. Hee Fat
34 Haw. 123 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1937)
Silva v. Hind-Clarke Dairy
33 Haw. 432 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1935)
A-One Building Co. v. Yee
32 Haw. 15 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1931)