Styles v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
This text of 423 So. 2d 604 (Styles v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A showing that the sheriff attempted, unsuccessfully, to personally serve the defendant with process at her home, each occasion being a workday, after 8:00 a.m. and before 6:00 p.m., when appellant’s place of employment was known to the appellee, is not evidence that appellant was concealing her whereabouts or avoiding process so as to justify substituted service pursuant to Section 48.161, Florida Statutes (1977). Bird v. International Graphics, Inc., 362 So.2d 316 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). The order denying appellant’s motion to vacate the final judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
423 So. 2d 604, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/styles-v-united-states-fidelity-guaranty-co-fladistctapp-1982.