Styles v. Huber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Styles v. Huber

233 A.D. 745

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 233 A.D. 745 (Styles v. Huber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Styles v. Huber, 233 A.D. 745 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed upon the law and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The trial justice committed prejudicial error in receiving the testimony of the witness Coddington as to a conversation with the chauffeur, Huber, after the accident, appearing at folios 383-385, and in charging the jury that they might consider this testimony as affecting the credibility of Huber. No foundation was laid for the reception of this evidence. (Larkin v. Nassau Electric R. R. Co., 205 N. Y. 267.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed upon the law and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. The trial justice committed prejudicial error in receiving the testimony of the witness Coddington as to a conversation with the chauffeur, Huber, after the accident, appearing at folios 383-385, and in charging the jury that they might consider this testimony as affecting the credibility of Huber. No foundation was laid for the reception of this evidence. (Larkin v. Nassau Electric R. R. Co., 205 N. Y. 267.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 A.D. 745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/styles-v-huber-nyappdiv-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack