Styles v. Harrison

41 S.W. 333, 99 Tenn. 128
Tennessee Supreme Court·Decided May 26, 1897·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Beard, J.

The only question in this case is, Is a judgment rendered on Sunday in one of the Courts of this State valid ?

It was a maxim of the common law that dies dominions non est dies juridicus. Broom’s Maxims, 21; Swann v. Broome, 3 Burr, 1595. Accordingly, no valid judgment can be rendered on Sunday. 1 Black [129] on Judgments, Sec. 182; 1 Freeman on Judgments, 138; 24 Am. & Eng. Enc. L., 577; Ex parte White, 15 Nev., 146 (S. C., 37 A. R., 466). The cases all show that such a judgment is not simply erroneous, but is absolutely void. 1 Black, Sec. 182; Houghtaling v. Osborne, 15 John, 115; Arthur v. Mosly, 2 Bibb, 589; Davis v. Fish, 1 Green, 406; 48 Am. Dec., 391; Blood v. Bates, 31 Vt., 147; Chapman v. State, 5 Black, 111.

While now, for the first time, the' question here considered has directly arisen in this State, yet, in the opinion of this Court in Elrod v. Gray Lumber Co., 92 Tenn., 476, in distinguishing the statute under consideration in that case from a somewhat similar statute construed by the Supreme Court of Wisconsin, in Lampe v. Manning, 38 Wis., 676, this Court clearly indicated its opinion that Sunday was dies non jioridicus.

It follows that the Circuit Judge was right in discharging from confinement the petitioners, who were illegally restrained of their liberty in the county workhouse, for the nonpayment of fines adjudged against them on Sunday, for alleged commission of certain misdemeanors, and his judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Styles v. Harrison, 41 S.W. 333, 99 Tenn. 128 (Tenn. 1897).

41 S.W. 333 (Styles v. Harrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. King
40 S.W.3d 442 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2001)
Martin v. Beer Board for City of Dickson
908 S.W.2d 941 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1995)
Moss v. State
131 Tenn. 94 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1914)