Styler v. Long Island Railroad

27 N.Y.S. 1113, 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 547, 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 727, 75 Hun 547
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 12, 1894·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

DYKMAN, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial upon the minutes of the court. The action is for the recovery of damages resulting from a personal injury to the plaintiff, by reason of the negligence of the defendant. The testimony upon the trial was contradictory; that on the part of the plaintiff making a cause of action for him, and that on the part of the defendant sufficient to exculpate the company. It was therefore a proper case for the jury, and the trial judge submitted the same in a charge which was eminently fair towards the defendant, and the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. We must assume, therefore, that the testimony on the part of the plaintiff commanded the belief of the jury, and in that view the verdict cannot be disturbed. We find no error, and the judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Styler v. Long Island Railroad, 27 N.Y.S. 1113, 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 547, 58 N.Y. St. Rep. 727, 75 Hun 547 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

27 N.Y.S. 1113 (Styler v. Long Island Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sulyewski v. Windholz
30 N.Y.S. 230 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1894)
Foulke v. Thalmessinger
28 N.Y.S. 684 (Superior Court of New York, 1894)
Foulke v. Thalmessinger
58 N.Y. St. Rep. 849 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1894)