Styled Real Estate, LLC and Michelle "Shelly" Scanlin v. Savannah Lacey Manhold, Sarah Cruse, and Lauren Price Laroche, and Chance Brown Real Estate, LLC
This text of Styled Real Estate, LLC and Michelle "Shelly" Scanlin v. Savannah Lacey Manhold, Sarah Cruse, and Lauren Price Laroche, and Chance Brown Real Estate, LLC (Styled Real Estate, LLC and Michelle "Shelly" Scanlin v. Savannah Lacey Manhold, Sarah Cruse, and Lauren Price Laroche, and Chance Brown Real Estate, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued May 29, 2025
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00661-CV ——————————— STYLED REAL ESTATE, LLC AND MICHELLE "SHELLY" SCANLIN, Appellants V. SAVANNAH LACEY MANHOLD, SARAH CRUSE, AND LAUREN PRICE LAROCHE, AND CHANCE BROWN REAL ESTATE, LLC, Appellees
On Appeal from the 215th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2021-03329
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants, Styled Real Estate LLC and Michelle Scanlin, filed a notice of
appeal seeking to appeal an interlocutory order awarding attorney’s fees and
requiring satisfaction of the award prior to entry of final judgment. On April 13, 2025, the successor trial court judge granted reconsideration and vacated the August
9, 2024 order “in its entirety, subject to further order of this Court.” See TEX. R. APP.
P. 29.5 (“While an appeal from an interlocutory order is pending, the trial court
retains jurisdiction of the case and unless prohibited by statute may make further
orders, including one dissolving the order complained of on appeal.”). Appellants
subsequently filed a written notice advising our Court of the successor trial court
judge’s order and requesting that our Court “render any order or judgment that it
determines is required or proper under the circumstances, both in this cause and in
the related mandamus proceeding.”
Accordingly, because the challenged order has been vacated, we dismiss the
appeal as moot. See Alorica and Alorica, Inc. v. Jasso, No. 08-18-00158-CV, 2018
WL 6191488, at *1 (Tex. App.—El Paso Nov. 28, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op.)
(dismissing appeal from interlocutory order as moot where trial court vacated
interlocutory order while appeal was pending). We further dismiss any pending
motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Caughey and Johnson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Styled Real Estate, LLC and Michelle "Shelly" Scanlin v. Savannah Lacey Manhold, Sarah Cruse, and Lauren Price Laroche, and Chance Brown Real Estate, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/styled-real-estate-llc-and-michelle-shelly-scanlin-v-savannah-lacey-texapp-2025.