Stuyvesant Insurance v. Militello

88 P.2d 569, 104 Colo. 32, 1939 Colo. LEXIS 247
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided February 27, 1939·No. No. 14,517.·Published

Opinions

Mr. Justice Bakke

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff in error here was one of the insurers of the property involved in North River Ins. Co. v. Militello, 104 Colo. 28. It was stipulated that the pronouncement in that case should apply also to this; consequently the judgment below is affirmed for the reasons given in that opinion.

Mr. Justice Knous, Mr. Justice Bock and Mr. Justice Burke concur in the conclusion only, it being their view [33]*33that the law of the case was settled by the opinion in North River Ins. Co. v. Militello, 100 Colo. 343, 67 P. (2d) 625.

Mb. Justice Francis E. Bouck specially concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stuyvesant Insurance v. Militello, 88 P.2d 569, 104 Colo. 32, 1939 Colo. LEXIS 247 (Colo. 1939).

88 P.2d 569 (Stuyvesant Insurance v. Militello) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

North River Insurance v. Militello
88 P.2d 567 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1939)
North River Insurance v. Militello
67 P.2d 625 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1937)