Stuyvesant Insurance v. Militello
This text of 88 P.2d 569 (Stuyvesant Insurance v. Militello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
delivered the opinion of the court.
Plaintiff in error here was one of the insurers of the property involved in North River Ins. Co. v. Militello, 104 Colo. 28. It was stipulated that the pronouncement in that case should apply also to this; consequently the judgment below is affirmed for the reasons given in that opinion.
Mr. Justice Knous, Mr. Justice Bock and Mr. Justice Burke concur in the conclusion only, it being their view [33]*33that the law of the case was settled by the opinion in North River Ins. Co. v. Militello, 100 Colo. 343, 67 P. (2d) 625.
Mb. Justice Francis E. Bouck specially concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 P.2d 569, 104 Colo. 32, 1939 Colo. LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stuyvesant-insurance-v-militello-colo-1939.