Stutts v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Stutts v. State

148 So. 925, 25 Ala. App. 684

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 6, 1933

Docket8 Div. 752.

StatusPublished

This text of 148 So. 925 (Stutts v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stutts v. State, 148 So. 925, 25 Ala. App. 684 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

*685 SAMFORD, Judge.

Defendant was indicted on a charge of selling certain cotton describing it by numbers and weights. The evidence for the state utterly failed to prove the charge as laid. The defendant was entitled to the general charge. For the error in refusing to give this charge as requested, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*685 SAMFORD, Judge.

Defendant was indicted on a charge of selling certain cotton describing it by numbers and weights. The evidence for the state utterly failed to prove the charge as laid. The defendant was entitled to the general charge. For the error in refusing to give this charge as requested, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 So. 925, 25 Ala. App. 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stutts-v-state-alactapp-1933.