Stutts v. State
148 So. 925, 25 Ala. App. 684
Opinion
Defendant was indicted on a charge of selling certain cotton describing it by numbers and weights. The evidence for the state utterly failed to prove the charge as laid. The defendant was entitled to the general charge. For the error in refusing to give this charge as requested, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stutts v. State, 148 So. 925, 25 Ala. App. 684 (Ala. Ct. App. 1933).
148 So. 925 (Stutts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.