Stutsky v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad
This text of 94 N.Y.S. 433 (Stutsky v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It was error for the trial justice to dismiss the complaint at the close of the plaintiff’s case, for there was uncontradicted evidence of more than one attack upon the plaintiff by fellow passengers, and of notice thereof by the conductor in charge of the car of the defendant, which by law “is bound, so far as prac[434]*434ticable, td 'protect his passengers, while being conveyed, from violence committed by strangers and co-passengers.” Stewart v. Brooklyn & Crosstown R. Co., 90 N. Y. 588, 591, 43 Am. Rep. 185.
Judgment- reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 N.Y.S. 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stutsky-v-brooklyn-heights-railroad-nyappterm-1905.