Sturtevant v. Wineland
This text of 22 Neb. 702 (Sturtevant v. Wineland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On February 7, 1887, the plaintiff in error filed his petition in error in this court. The summons in error seems to have been issued, served, and returned. No transcript, however, has ever been filed, and the attorney of the defendant in error now moves to dismiss the proceeding in error, principally upon the ground that no transcript has been filed. This motion was heard after notice had been given to the plaintiff in error of the. pendency thereof. The motion must be sustained. There being no transcript filed, there is nothing before the court except the petition in error, and the time having elapsed in which the plaintiff could file the transcript, his rights in that regard are barred,
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 Neb. 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sturtevant-v-wineland-neb-1888.