Sturr v. Beck

6 Dakota 71
CourtSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota
DecidedMay 15, 1888
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 6 Dakota 71 (Sturr v. Beck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sturr v. Beck, 6 Dakota 71 (dakotasup 1888).

Opinion

By the Court :

The judgment is affirmed. The court holds that the homesteader was the prior appropriator of the water right, and the plaintiff had no right to enter upon the prior possession of the entryman, under his homestead entry, and appropriate any portion of the running streams or creeks thereon.

All of the justices concur except Francis and Garland, JJ., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Platt v. City of Rapid City
291 N.W. 600 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1940)
Driskill v. Rebbe
117 N.W. 135 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1908)
Lone Tree Ditch Co. v. Cyclone Ditch Co.
91 N.W. 352 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Dakota 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sturr-v-beck-dakotasup-1888.