Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Sturm v. Sturm

Sturm v. Sturm

580 N.E.2d 1101, 62 Ohio St. 3d 1472, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 3168
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sturm v. Sturm. Read the opinion of the Court — 63 Ohio St. 3d 671 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 27, 1991·No. 90-1578·Published

Opinion

Ashtabula County, No. 89-A-1451. Reported at 61 Ohio St.3d 298, 574 N.E.2d 522. On motion for rehearing. Rehearing denied.

Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent. Wright, J., not participating. Moyer, C.J., and H. Brown, J., would also grant the motion to strike. Wright, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sturm v. Sturm, 580 N.E.2d 1101, 62 Ohio St. 3d 1472, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 3168 (Ohio 1991).

580 N.E.2d 1101 (Sturm v. Sturm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sturm v. Sturm
574 N.E.2d 522 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1991)