Sturm v. Regan

588 So. 2d 595, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6975, 1991 WL 120791
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 10, 1991
DocketNo. 90-1932
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 588 So. 2d 595 (Sturm v. Regan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sturm v. Regan, 588 So. 2d 595, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6975, 1991 WL 120791 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final judgment entered in favor of appellee on his counterclaim. We remand for a new trial on the issue of what actual damage appellee incurred as the result of appellant’s breach of the contract. See Lefemine v. Baron, 573 So.2d 326 (Fla. 1991).

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR A NEW TRIAL.

ANSTEAD, POLEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Kelley
588 So. 2d 595 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
588 So. 2d 595, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6975, 1991 WL 120791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sturm-v-regan-fladistctapp-1991.