Sturm v. Lyding
This text of 109 A.D.2d 1102 (Sturm v. Lyding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order unanimously reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, without costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: In view of the history of this proceeding (see, Sturm v Lyding, 101 [1103]*1103AD2d 1026; Sturm v Lyding, 96 AD2d 731) and since Suzanne is about to reach her majority, we do not believe it is in her best interests to compel visitation by means of an arrest warrant. (Appeal from order of Niagara County Family Court, Halpin, J. — quash warrant.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and O’Donnell, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 A.D.2d 1102, 487 N.Y.S.2d 203, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sturm-v-lyding-nyappdiv-1985.