Sturm v. Lyding

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sturm v. Lyding

109 A.D.2d 1102, 487 N.Y.S.2d 203, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47603

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sturm v. Lyding. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 A.D.2d 731 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 1, 1985·Published

Opinion

— Order unanimously reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, without costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: In view of the history of this proceeding (see, Sturm v Lyding, 101 [1103]*1103AD2d 1026; Sturm v Lyding, 96 AD2d 731) and since Suzanne is about to reach her majority, we do not believe it is in her best interests to compel visitation by means of an arrest warrant. (Appeal from order of Niagara County Family Court, Halpin, J. — quash warrant.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and O’Donnell, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order unanimously reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, without costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: In view of the history of this proceeding (see, Sturm v Lyding, 101 [1103]*1103AD2d 1026; Sturm v Lyding, 96 AD2d 731) and since Suzanne is about to reach her majority, we do not believe it is in her best interests to compel visitation by means of an arrest warrant. (Appeal from order of Niagara County Family Court, Halpin, J. — quash warrant.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and O’Donnell, JJ.

Sturm v. Lyding, 109 A.D.2d 1102, 487 N.Y.S.2d 203, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47603 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

109 A.D.2d 1102 (Sturm v. Lyding) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related