Sturm v. Gibson

159 So. 2d 917
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 24, 1964
DocketNo. 3860
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 159 So. 2d 917 (Sturm v. Gibson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sturm v. Gibson, 159 So. 2d 917 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, one of the beneficiaries under the Will of Della Swan, deceased, appeals an order approving a compromise and settlement of the claims of certain re-maindermen and heirs of decedent’s husband who predeceased her and, who it was claimed, threatened the Estate with costly litigation.

The briefs and record on appeal have now been read and given full consideration, and appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. The order of the county judge appealed from, should be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

KANNER, Acting C. J., and SHANNON, J., and PATTISHALL, W. A., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sturm v. Gibson
185 So. 2d 732 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 So. 2d 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sturm-v-gibson-fladistctapp-1964.