Sturm, Tim, Individually and D/B/A Centerra Tubular Company v. Tubular Inspectors, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 4, 2009
Docket13-97-00196-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Sturm, Tim, Individually and D/B/A Centerra Tubular Company v. Tubular Inspectors, Inc. (Sturm, Tim, Individually and D/B/A Centerra Tubular Company v. Tubular Inspectors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sturm, Tim, Individually and D/B/A Centerra Tubular Company v. Tubular Inspectors, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-97-00196-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

TIM STURM, INDIVIDUALLY, AND D/B/A

CENTERRA TUBULAR COMPANY, Appellant,



v.



TUBULAR INSPECTORS, INC., Appellee.

_____________________________________________________________



On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Nueces County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



This appeal was abated by this Court on May 29, 1997, due to the bankruptcy of one of the parties to this appeal. See 11 U.S.C. § 362; see generally Tex. R. App. P. 8. Since the abatement there has been no activity in this appeal. On April 16, 2009, the Court ordered the parties to file an advisory regarding the status of the appeal and, if applicable, a motion to reinstate the appeal or a motion to dismiss the appeal.

Appellee responded to the order by filing a motion to dismiss, advising the Court that appellant was discharged in bankruptcy. Accordingly, appellee's motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 4th day of June, 2009.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Automatic stay
11 U.S.C. § 362

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sturm, Tim, Individually and D/B/A Centerra Tubular Company v. Tubular Inspectors, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sturm-tim-individually-and-dba-centerra-tubular-co-texapp-2009.