Sturkey v. Ozmint
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6535
WILLIE JOE STURKEY, a/k/a Willie Sturkey, a/k/a Willie J. Sturkey,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JON OZMINT, Director SCDC; MICHAEL MATTHEW, SCDC Division of Records; MS. WATTA, Paymaster; WARDEN BAZZLE, Perry Correctional Institution, in their individual capacity; MRS. F OGUNSILE, a/k/a Felicia Ogunsile, Case Manager, Perry Correctional Institution; MRS. NFN ROOF, Financial Accountant,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (8:07-cv-01502-MBS)
Submitted: February 9, 2010 Decided: March 1, 2010
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Joe Sturkey, Appellant Pro Se. Nathaniel Heyward Clarkson, III, Amy Miller Snyder, CLARKSON WALSH TERRELL & COULTER, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Willie Joe Sturkey appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Sturkey v. Ozmint, No. 8:07-cv-01502-MBS (D.S.C. Mar. 11, 2009).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sturkey v. Ozmint (Sturkey v. Ozmint) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.