Sturkey v. Ozmint

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 1, 2010·No. 09-6535·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6535

WILLIE JOE STURKEY, a/k/a Willie Sturkey, a/k/a Willie J. Sturkey,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

JON OZMINT, Director SCDC; MICHAEL MATTHEW, SCDC Division of Records; MS. WATTA, Paymaster; WARDEN BAZZLE, Perry Correctional Institution, in their individual capacity; MRS. F OGUNSILE, a/k/a Felicia Ogunsile, Case Manager, Perry Correctional Institution; MRS. NFN ROOF, Financial Accountant,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (8:07-cv-01502-MBS)

Submitted: February 9, 2010 Decided: March 1, 2010

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Joe Sturkey, Appellant Pro Se. Nathaniel Heyward Clarkson, III, Amy Miller Snyder, CLARKSON WALSH TERRELL & COULTER, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Willie Joe Sturkey appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Sturkey v. Ozmint, No. 8:07-cv-01502-MBS (D.S.C. Mar. 11, 2009).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sturkey v. Ozmint, (4th Cir. 2010).

Sturkey v. Ozmint (Sturkey v. Ozmint) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related