Sturgis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Sturgis v. State

1929 OK CR 472, 281 P. 1118, 45 Okla. Crim. 346, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 534

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 26, 1929

DocketNo. A-7157.

StatusPublished

This text of 1929 OK CR 472 (Sturgis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sturgis v. State, 1929 OK CR 472, 281 P. 1118, 45 Okla. Crim. 346, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 534 (Okla. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Oklahoma county on a charge of having the unlawful possession of whisky, and was sentenced in the county jail for a term of 45 days.

The judgment was rendered in April, 1928, and the appeal was lodged in this court in August, 1928. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed. The evidence discloses that at the time charged certain officers searched the premises of defendant and found a still and some 39 gallons of whisky. Defendant did not take the stand and offered no evidence. No reversible error appears in the record.

The ease is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Oklahoma county on a charge of having the unlawful possession of whisky, and was sentenced in the county jail for a term of 45 days.

The judgment was rendered in April, 1928, and the appeal was lodged in this court in August, 1928. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed. The evidence discloses that at the time charged certain officers searched the premises of defendant and found a still and some 39 gallons of whisky. Defendant did not take the stand and offered no evidence. No reversible error appears in the record.

The ease is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1929 OK CR 472, 281 P. 1118, 45 Okla. Crim. 346, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sturgis-v-state-oklacrimapp-1929.