Sturgis v. Rodman

14 Ind. 604
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1860·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Cwriam.

Suit by Rodman against Sturgis and Ellis, to recover money deposited with them by the plaintiff. The defendants were non-residents of the state, and proceedings in attachment were had. Ozias Bowen was summoned as garnishee. Several creditors of Stwgis and Ellis filed their claims under the attachment, and final judgment was rendered against Sturgis and Ellis, and Bowen as garnishee, by default.

Several errors are assigned, but we shall not notice them, as no steps were taken in the Court below to correct them. It has been settled by several decisions that in judgments taken by default, the defendant must make his application to the Court below to correct the error, if any exist, before bringing the case here.

The appeal is dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sturgis v. Rodman, 14 Ind. 604 (Ind. 1860).

14 Ind. 604 (Sturgis v. Rodman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Insurance v. Gibson
3 N.E. 892 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
Barnes v. Wright
39 Ind. 293 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1872)